Figure 1: Phylogenetically corrected patterns of divergence of vertebral number in garter snakes (Thamnophis spp.) across three adaptive zones, estimated and compared with MIPoD.

Figure 2: Garter snake (Thamnophis elegans) in California.
Figure 3:
Genome-wide Fst among replicate populations of threespine stickleback
in Alaska. Vertical shading represents linkage groups
(chromosomes), and solid arrows represent the most significant peaks of
differentiation between ancestral oceanic and derived freshwater
populations.
© 2007 Paul Hohenlohe

|
Research Program -- Overview
Since Darwin, evolutionary biology has faced a fundamental
question: How do
the microevolutionary processes operating within species scale up over
long periods of time to explain
macroevolutionary pattern? In particular, how does the genetic
architecture of variation -- the raw material of evolution -- shape the
structure of phenotypic variation, the response to selection, and the trajectories of diversification among
taxa? I combine theoretical and empirical techniques to address this question:
1) Phenotypic evolution
The theoretical foundation of evolutionary
genetics
provides a powerful framework for understanding microevolutionary
process. In particular, it allows us to (1) analyze the genetic
architecture of complex phenotypes in a statistical way, (2)
empirically measure the form of the adaptive landscape, and (3) test
predictive models of adaptation and divergence. Building on this
foundation, I have developed a new class of phylogenetic comparative
methods called MIPoD (Microevolutionary Inference from Patterns of Divergence). MIPoD leverages genetic information in the form of the G
matrix in a comparative framework to rigorously test hypotheses about
forms of natural selection and the adaptive landscape, based on actual
patterns of divergence among related taxa. I am currently
expanding the MIPoD approach to examine differences among adaptive
zones (Figures 1 & 2) and to test alternative evolutionary process
models of sexual selection (NSF co-PI with Steve Arnold) -- see some of our preliminary work here.
Related collaborative projects include simulation modeling to elucidate general patterns in the evolution of G, and a novel genetic network model to explore the relative roles of protein-coding versus cis-regulatory mutation, and to test the implicit assumptions of the G
matrix in the context of genetic regulatory networks.
2) Molecular population genomics
Classical evolutionary genetics has taken a statistical and model-based
approach to understanding genetic variation and evolutionary process,
and its traditional connection to empirical data has been limited to a
focus on one or a few genes or markers. However, with explosion of
data from modern DNA sequencing technology, evolutionary biology is on
the verge of uniting classical evolutionary genetics with a molecular
and functional understanding of not just individual genes, but entire
genomes.
With Bill Cresko and
colleagues,
I am developing novel analytical tools to estimate population genetic
parameters in natural populations as continuous variables across the
genome, and to conduct QTL and association mapping of
phenotypic
traits, using next-generation sequencing of RAD (Restriction site
Associated DNA) markers. These
techniques provide genomic sequence data at thousands of small regions
across multiple individuals, without any prior development of markers,
primers, or SNPs. From this work, the first high-density
SNP-based genome scan of parallel adaptation in threespine stickleback
will be out soon (Figure 3) -- we've found some remarkably consistent
genomic patterns across independently derived populations, so stay
tuned!
Because of the power of these techniques for association mapping and
the emerging field of population genomics, I am collaborating with a
number of colleagues on species of fish, snails, worms, and plants.
In addition, I plan to apply them to the evolution of garter
snake vertebral numbers (Figures 1 & 2), to connect the
perspectives of quantitative genetics and population genomics.
Thanks to:
|